Skip to content
Named Toddle 2026 Top 100 School Innovators
Frameworks

What should students become capable of doing?

Technology will keep changing.

The more capable our tools become, the more intentional we need to be about the capabilities students develop for themselves.

Three frameworks, one throughline: the thinking belongs to the student.

  • The Human Standards™
  • The HUMAN Framework for Assessment
  • Thinking With AI
Human Standards

What should students become capable of doing?

The Human Standards identify ten capabilities we believe become more, not less, important in an AI-shaped world.

They are organized across four interconnected domains.

Human Flourishing

  • Understand Self

    Who am I as a learner, and what do I need to grow?

  • Understand Others

    How do other people see and experience the world?

  • Build Community

    How do we belong, learn, and do good work together?

Human Thinking

  • Seek Truth

    How do I know what is true?

  • Think Critically

    What is the evidence, and what is missing?

  • Make Meaning

    What does this mean, and why does it matter?

Human Expression

  • Communicate With Purpose

    What do I want to say, to whom, and why?

  • Create With Intention

    What am I making, and what choices shape it?

Human Growth

  • Reflect and Grow

    What did I learn, and what will I do differently?

  • Learn and Adapt

    How do I keep learning when things change?

Throughline

Use Tools Responsibly

How can tools support, but not replace, my thinking?

The Human Standards: ten capabilities across four human domains (Human Flourishing, Human Thinking, Human Expression, and Human Growth), joined by the Use Tools Responsibly throughline.
The HUMAN Framework

Design learning that reveals more than a final product.

AI makes it increasingly difficult to infer learning from a polished final product alone.

The HUMAN Framework for Assessment offers five design moves that help educators create stronger evidence of student thinking and learning.

  • Honor Student Voice

    Choice of topic, format, or viewpoint

  • Use Authentic Audiences

    Create for peers, community, or publication

  • Make Thinking Visible

    Reflect, explain, and document decisions

  • Activate Collaboration

    Peer feedback, dialogue, co-construction, and collective problem-solving

  • Navigate AI Intentionally

    Leverage AI for support, not substitution

The HUMAN Framework is not a checklist.

The goal isn't to squeeze every HUMAN move into every learning experience. Educators select the moves that serve the learning.

The HUMAN Framework for AI-resilient assessment design: Honor Student Voice, Use Authentic Audiences, Make Thinking Visible, Activate Collaboration, and Navigate AI Intentionally.
Thinking With AI

Using AI well is a thinking skill.

Students don't only need rules about when AI is allowed.

They need strategies for remaining intellectually in charge while using it.

AI Thinking Cycle

A cycle that keeps the thinking with the student.

  • Think

    Generate ideas before AI

  • Talk

    Engage with AI as a partner

  • Check

    Read AI like a text

  • Refine

    Make human decisions

AI Spotter Method

A partnership model where the student does the lifting.

  • I do the work

    I start with my own thinking

  • AI spots me

    AI supports me so I can improve

  • I stay in charge

    I decide what happens next

POWER Lens

A lens for reading AI output critically.

  • Perspective

    Whose voice is represented?

  • Omission

    What is missing?

  • Weighting

    What is emphasized?

  • Effect

    Who is impacted?

  • Response

    What do we do?

The Progression

Think FirstUse AI WiselyCheck Critically
Thinking With AI: The Futurise Edu Toolkit, with three tools: the AI Thinking Cycle, the AI Spotter Method, and the POWER Lens.
The Whole Picture

One connected approach.

  1. Human StandardsWhat We Develop
  2. HUMAN FrameworkHow We Design
  3. Thinking With AIHow Students Engage With AI
  4. Seen AppHow Educators Put It Into Practice

These aren't separate initiatives. Together, they give educators a way to move from big questions about human learning to practical decisions about something they're teaching tomorrow.